ESG – Required/Desired Unmentionables

According to a recent Bloomberg survey:

About two-thirds of respondents in a survey of roughly 300 Bloomberg terminal users said the anti-ESG movement that started in the US last year will force firms to stop using those three letters in conversations with clients. However, they’ll continue to incorporate environmental, social and governance metrics in their business, they also said.

And the market reflects the controversy with corporate dollar denominated ESG bond sales declined from $91 billion in 2021 to $30 billion in 2023.

In addition, ESG isn’t highly ranked in importance:

Some 85% of respondents who identified themselves as being engaged with ESG said financial performance is the most important factor to consider when investing. Only 39% said the same of ESG, which was the lowest reading in the survey.

On the flip side, Bloomberg also reports that Morgan Stanley, the 7th largest underwriter of ESG debt, reports a decent pipeline growing stronger into 2024 and BNP Paribas, the largest underwriter, is predicting a banner year.

So why continue to incorporate ESG when you can mention it and don’t think highly of the concept and why the divergence in between “decent pipeline” and “banner year”?

The answer is a mix of increasing demand for ESG investments with faster growth outside of the US and regulatory requirements. While the GOP is making ESG a four-letter word in the US, the EU is strengthening ESG requirements including verification of ESG validity and compliance. The SEC is also increasing scrutiny of ESG claims.

So, the current situation:

  • Many investors, including major institutions, want ESG investments.
  • EU and other non-US investment regulators are increasingly requiring ESG reporting and in some cases requiring some level of ESG investment.
  • US and other regulators are cracking down on “greenwashing” i.e. falsely claiming ESG compliance.
  • US will fall behind EU and other countries in requiring, originating, and regulating ESG investments.

Post navigation

← ESG Lawsuits

Related Posts

ESG Lawsuits

According to GreenBiz: ” Lawsuits involving ESG-related issues have increased by 25 percent over the past three decades, according to research published earlier this year by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)…..

Broadridge, a fintech company, also highlights regulator crackdowns on greenwashing and an increase in event-driven securities litigation — where lawsuits are filed over significant events that impact a company’s share price — as drivers of ESG-related securities and class action lawsuits…..

One well-documented impact of ESG-related lawsuits is the trend of “greenhushing,” where companies under-communicate their sustainability activities to avoid greenwashing accusations or political attacks. With regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission taking action against corporations for misleading claims about corporate and product sustainability claims, the fallout related to greenwashing has expanded from reputational risk to compliance risk….

And this is before or in the initial stages of the “SEC’s planned climate-related disclosures rule and the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive…”

This doesn’t include Republican attacks on ESG or on any socially responsible investment criteria (investment managers are supposed to focus on profits, clients choking to death on discharges from their profitable investments are not investment relevant). Nor the reputational (as opposed to legal) risk of companies and investment managers claiming to be “ESG conscious” while investing in oil, or other non-green or anti-green sectors (just ask BlackRock’s Larry Fink defending ESG and then BlackRock appoints the CEO of Aramco to its board (BlackRock Appoints CEO of Oil Giant Aramco to Its Board – Bloomberg).

The full article can be found at: Get ready for more ESG lawsuits | Greenbiz
Advice can be obtained from our strategic partners. Feel free to contact us for introductions.

ESG – Environment/Social/Governance: What & Why?

ESG is the application of socially aware and responsible standards centered on the environment, society, and internal governance.

ESG investment refers to an investment strategy which seeks equivalent or higher returns while simultaneously making a positive impact in three areas: environmental, social and governance

According to the U.S. SEC:

  • The environmental factor might focus on a company’s impact on the environment, or the risks and opportunities associated with the impacts of climate change on the company, its business and its industry.
  • The social factor might focus on the company’s relationship with people and society, or whether the company invests in its community.
  • The governance factor might focus on issues such as how the company is run and executive compensation.

Investors, especially institutional investors, have increasingly focused on the ESG aspects of their investments from a mixture of concern, profit, and regulatory pressure. This emphasis has in turn put pressure on investment recipients to conform with ESG standards in a reportable manner.

More specifically:

               Environment – too often viewed solely as energy consumption/emissions addressable by decarbonizing. Environment refers to the entirety of the environment including air/water/sound pollution, energy consumption, ecological features, and aesthetics.

               Social – refers to the human factors such as labor standards, workplace health & safety, local community involvement/benefits/impacts. It can be as simple as providing nutritional advice to tenants to economic development for the local community.

               Governance – referring to the entity’s internal governance practices – is ESG a recognized standard, are there internal rules for ESG measurements and compliance, what is the level of commitment – an analysist or the C-Suite.

_____________________________

Why ESG / Sustainability

The simplest answer is that sustainability is necessary to the survival of civilization and perhaps humanity. Pretentious sounding but the UN estimates that humanity is consuming the equivalent of 1.6 planets. In other words, in the seven months from January 2022 to July 2022 humanity consumed all the biological resources that the Earth regenerates over the entire year. And as a purely financial matter, it’s also good business reducing costs and increasing profits to be explained in future posts.